Gene Keyes
1973-08-10
1979-02-15 2nd ed., revised and expanded
2009-07-18 3rd ed., further revised and expanded
10 Principles for a Coherent World Map System
Note: This is the précis for what
was intended to be a revised, enlarged version of my 1973 M.A. thesis,
originally entitled "Six Principles for a Unified Map System
(Applied to the China-Russia Situation)" (Carbondale: Southern
Illinois University, Government Dept., 1973) 217 p. + 49 maps. It included
a test sequence using hand, photo, and computer-drawn maps (20 cm) to show
China and Russia together at 1/50,000,000, from 1950 B.C. to 1950 A.D.
(19 panels), then zero in to Chenpao / Damansky Island at 1/5,000, the
site of their almost-nuclear-war in 1969 (20 panels).
The basic projection for the System in the thesis was Buckminster
Fuller's 1954 icosahedral model, but this later proved unsatisfactory due
to its contortion of East Asia, unwieldy layout, and totally irregular
graticule. In 1975, after the thesis, I supplanted Fuller with my
re-design of B.J.S.
Cahill's octahedral world map. Among innumerable trial panels, I have
drawn by hand a 2 x 2 meter world map at 1/20,000,000 (5° graticule);
a 1 x 2 meter world map also at 1:20,000,000 (with a 1° graticule plus
national borders); a 1 square meter panel of Canada's Atlantic provinces
at 1/1,000,000; a 40 cm panel of Denmark at 1/1,000,000; the one-meter octant
graticule for a 1/10,000,000 map with 1° graticule; and 16 one-meter
test panels of the 1° graticule for a Mega-Map at 1/1,000,000.
Personal exigencies sidelined the map project in 1984, but after
retirement in 2003, I resumed it, along with my study of Cahill’s unpublished
cartography. Whether or not this "Coherent World Map System" can be implemented
in whole or in part is problematic. Since my thesis 36 years ago, there
has been a whole new era in computer graphics, the Internet, online maps,
and Google Earth, et al. Perhaps they have made this entire endeavor moot.
Nonetheless, and incomplete though it is, I am presenting some components
here on my
website.
Meanwhile, Google maps are still stuck in the 16th century of Mercator,
and all the wonders of the Web are still a veneer on deep geographic
ignorance. So I will keep developing this hobby-horse in hopes that sooner
or later it might be of use to general education.
As stated in my critique of Fuller's map,
I want a single, general purpose, world map projection,
with high fidelity to a globe, suitable at all scales from
smallest to largest, good for one country or the whole planet.
I want a world map and globe as a synoptic pair, comparable
to each other at a glance, or in detail. I want globes and maps each
to have at least a 5° graticule. I want geography learners at any
age to be able to grasp the globe and world map as readily as do-re-mi.
Cahill is the key.
Earlier versions of this paper were presented
at the Canadian Association of Geographers (1974), the International
Studies Association (1975), and the Canadian Cartographic Association
(1979).
Dr. Gene Keyes
Berwick, Nova Scotia
2009-07-18
Précis
Most world maps are notoriously distorted
and open-ended. Most other political- historical maps are a chaos of
unrelated projections and perspectives, scales and sizes, grids and
graticules, shapes and formats: orphans with no complete parent world
map nor globe. Regional sections focus on Europe or America; shrink Africa
and Asia. So-called "authoritative" political maps are seldom available,
except as secret weapons of international conflict. Thus, geopolitical
ignorance remains endemic, however well-drawn a particular map,
series, atlas, or GIS specimen.
To facilitate comprehension of the entire earth as a finite
frame of natural and human events, a "Coherent World Map System" is
herewith propounded. All of its sub-squares are based on the same Master World Profile (revised Cahill projection) in a specified scale
progression from tiny to giant; at constant sizes, perspectives, and
graticules; with geocells of 1° or at least 5°; and formatted so
that hierarchical miniatures relate all main maps and globes in the system
to one another: the whole earth to the street where you live. All panels
belong to a millimeter matrix on a proposed 1/1,000,000 "Megamap" version
40 meters long, and its correlates: reduced, enlarged, or detached.
The Coherent World Map System is engendered by the precise
interlinkage of these ten requisites:
1) PROJECTION: The Master World Profile, encompassing
every map in the system, is B.J.S. Cahill's octahedronal transformation
(1909), as modified by Gene Keyes in 1975 (top of page; also, large diagram here). Despite
gradated compression averaging 14% of nominal scale, the design evinces
better felicity, symmetry, and overall fidelity to a globe than any other
single-world-map projection. It shows every continent unbroken, as well
as all 64,800 one-degree geocells in close proportion to each other.
2) SCALE: The system has 15 main scales, in a macro-micro
range of 30, increasing at a 2× - 2× - 2.5× progression
from a moon's-eye view of the earth (1:2,000,000,000) to a mole's-eye
view (l : 0.5). (See table below.)
3) SIZE: The system has 12 set sizes (4 back-up, 4 main,
4 super), increasing at the same progression, from a one centimeter
cell to the 40 meter Megamap. (See table below.)
4) SHAPE: All panels in the system are square. Besides graphic
consistency, this shape enables:
(a) the viewer's apparent altitude to equal the map's kilometer
span;
(b) any sub-map to join its neighbors in a mosaic congruent
with the grid of the Master World Profile;
(c) any map in the system to represent an integral span in
tenfolds of only 1, 2, 4, 5, or 8 metric units.
(.A rectangular exception can be made for doub1e-square
world maps at super sizes where ceiling heights or floor
space constraints are a factor.)
5) PERSPECTIVE: To enhance the viewer's perception of the
earth's entirety as well as its finitude, the system emphasizes:
(a) The delimited, self-enclosing nature of the Cahill-Keyes
world profile: its octants are pre-numbered to form a "Basic Eight"
for the learner's mental grasp of the planet; they can be re-arranged
into other patterns and extensions.
(b) The comprehensive nature of map sub-sets: the system
stresses wholistic vistas of geo-historical areas and epochs, from
stable viewpoints (e.g., Eurasia, not just European Russia), as well
as large-scale close-ups of critical locales.
(c) The constant relation of any sub-map to the Master World
Profile by means of a metric grid proportionate to its scale: smaller-size
world maps in the system are direct reductions of the Megamap and
its grid; and smaller-scale regional maps are direct cut-outs from the
grid of a complete Cahill-Keyes world profile. (However, larger-scale
plans — cities, etc. — may be adapted from conventional sheets to accord
with the system's size, shape, and alignment.)
6) GRID: The system's nexus is the 1/1,000,000 Master World
Profile, the Megamap, as inscribed within the length of a 40,000 x
40,000 millimeter grid. A corresponding matrix recurs in every other panel
of the system. The grid can:
(a) specify the map equivalent of any square kilometer
on earth with an 11-character lower-left coordinate, e.g., my old Halifax
neighborhood: 12879x24899. (Three more decimal places could specify
any square meter on earth);
(b) extract any existing or potential map in the system at
any combination of scale or size by prefixing their codes to the
lower-left coordinate; e.g., my old Halifax neighborhood at 1/5,000
centered in a 1 square meter map: 15,03:12877x24897. (Thus, 17 characters
in all, or 25 to identify a terrestrial square meter.)
(c) replicate the Master World Profile into junior index
maps at every other main scale or size in the system. A 200 x 200
millimeter preview grid tessellates a Scale 1, Size 1 "Mini Master
Map", the given "standard size" of the system. Each cell enlarges progressively
through the first 8 scales, the millimeter lengths being 1, 2, 4, 10,
20, 40, 100, and 200, where, at Scale 8, or 1/1,000;000, every original
cell has dilated to the standard 200 mm size, and forms an accent matrix
on the intervening millimeter grid of the Master World Profile. The new
sub-cells enlarge in a variant progression of 2× - 2.5× - 2×
until they show 1 square kilometer in a 1 square meter map (1/1,000), the
millimeter lengths being 1, 2, 5, 20, 50, 100, 200, 500, and 1,000, where
another millimeter sub-matrix can depict terrestrial square meters, if
desired.
Update 2011-06-07: with reference to the digital version of the Megamap, as programmed by Mary Jo Graça, the
full length of it is now set within a grid span of 40,000 mm x 20,000 mm:
a "double-square" rectangle rather than a square with 40,000 mm on each side.
Also, the km coordinates are read from a zero point at the upper left, rather
than lower left, and therefore the y-axis goes from 0 to 20,000 mm, instead
of 0 to 40,000 mm as in my original notion.
7) GRATICULE: The system's graticular design emphasizes visibility,
symmetry, regularity, and proportionality; all maps are to show a complete
1° graticule at scales of 1/20,000,000 or larger, and 5° for
the 3 smaller main scales, including globes. While the Master World
Profile has a conventional north-up alignment, the sub-maps' meridians
are not necessarily vertical, and tend toward 60° either way, incident
to the x-axis of the grid.
8) GEOCELLS: Defined hereby as one degree of latitude and longitude,
geocells are central to the Cahill-Keyes map design. Its
touchstone is proportionality of each adjacent geocell, one to
the next. Not only does the System insist upon 1° or at least 5°
resolution, but also that rows and columns of geocells not deviate perceptibly
in height or width from their contiguous counterparts (while allowing
for the projection's gradual shrinkage toward the center of each octant).
9) FORMAT: The system's map sets exhibit these graphic determinants:
(a) Conspicuous scale distinction, re-accentuated by
the grid-cell size;
(b) Total span in kilometers of each panel, shown at its lower
right (plus miles);
(c) Absence of top and right margins, enabling edge-to-edge
assemblies;
(d) An array of 21 back-up maps in 3 columns, 7 rows, relating
any main panel to the entire system; each miniature is twice the scale
of the one to its left, 10 times that above it, and 1/10 as long as
its major counterpart.
10) SYNOPTIC GLOBAL FIDELITY Creating a globe/map partnership,
the system calls for
a) complementary octant-marked 1° or at least
5° political globes at the same scale as counterpart world maps; in particular,
globes with diameters in inches of 2.5, 5, 10, 25, and 50. (See
table below; inches happen to work better than centimeters as a globe
diameter with metric scales, e.g., 1/50,000,000 is a 10-inch globe.)
b) octant-marked 1° or at least 5° orthographic
(global) maps, of at least the first 5 main scales, as well as counterpart
geophysical and/or satellite-image globes, whole-earth photos, and
remote images.
c) a synoptic globe-plus-map pairing whereby the equator and
the two main Cahill-Keyes great-circle meridians are the same length
in either spherical or flat-map form (the interchangeable cognate scale
of the globe and map pair);
d) a metric understanding of the global basis of a kilometer
and a meter and a millimeter;
e) a correspondingly easy-to-grasp set of rational metric
scales such as 1/200,000,000 and 1/100,000,000 and 1/50,000,000
and 1/20,000,000, etc.
In short, the Coherent World Map System derives all of its
offspring from a single Master World Profile, dovetailing them with
corresponding globes and satellite imagery. It could provide a common
canvas for world history and current affairs; it could help renovate
geography teaching and social studies mapwork.
Appendix 1:
Table of Scales and Sizes
For the Coherent World Map System
|
Scale
|
Code for
Scale
OR Size
|
|
Size
(length)
|
|
Globe diameter
at given scale
(Earth diameter = 12,735 km, but inches are
better for globe size)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
inches
|
cm
|
|
|
Aa
|
|
1 cm
|
|
|
|
Back-up
Scales
|
|
|
Back-up
Sizes
|
|
|
|
|
"
|
1/2,000,000,000
|
A
|
"
|
2 cm
|
|
1/4 in
|
0.6 cm
|
"
|
1/1,000,000,000
|
B
|
"
|
4 cm
|
|
1/2 in |
1.3 cm
|
"
|
1/500,000,000
|
C
|
"
|
10 cm
|
|
1 in
|
2.5 cm
|
Main Scales
|
|
|
Main
Sizes
|
|
|
|
|
|
1/200,000,000
|
1
|
"
|
20 cm
|
Mini Master Map
(notebook)
|
2.5 in
|
6.3 cm
|
"
|
1/100,000,000
|
2
|
"
|
40 cm
|
(desk)
|
5 in
|
12.7 cm
|
"
|
1/50,000,000
|
3
|
"
|
1 m
|
(poster)
|
10 in
|
25.4 cm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
"
|
1/20,000,000
|
4
|
"
|
2 m
|
Jr. Master Map
(wall)
|
25 in
|
63.5 cm
|
|
1/10,000,000
|
5
|
Super
Sizes
|
4 m
|
Sr. Master Map
(big wall)
|
50 in
|
127 cm
|
"
|
1/5,000,000
|
6
|
"
|
10 m
|
|
100 in
|
254 cm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
"
|
1/2,000,000
|
7
|
"
|
20 m
|
|
250 in
(21 ft)
|
637 cm
|
"
|
1/1,000,000
|
8
|
"
|
40 m
|
Megamap (plaza
or gym floor)
|
500 in
(42 ft)
|
1,274
cm
(12.7 m)
|
"
|
1/500,000
|
9
|
|
100 m
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
"
|
1/200,000
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
|
"
|
1/100,000
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
|
"
|
1/50,000
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
"
|
1/20,000
|
13
|
|
|
|
|
|
"
|
1/10,000
|
14
|
|
|
|
|
|
"
|
1/5,000
|
15
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ultra
Scales
|
|
|
Ultra
Sizes
|
|
|
|
|
|
1/2,000
|
16
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1/1,000
|
17
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1/500
|
18
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.200
|
19
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1/100
|
20
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1/50
|
21
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1/20
|
22
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1/10
|
23
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1/5
|
24
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1/2
|
X
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1/1
|
Y
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1/0.5
|
Z
|
|
|
|
|
|
Appendix 2:
These are some related papers I have presented or circulated:
1) "Six Principles for a Unified Map System" (Canadian Association
of Geographers Annual Meeting, Toronto, 1974-05) 7 p.
2) "Prospectus for a Unified Map System" (International Studies
Association Annual Meeting, Washington, D.C., 1975~02) 5 p. + 2 wall
maps.
3) "World Maps, World Politics, and World Vision: An Appreciation
of B.J.S. Cahill (1866-1944)" (Unpublished Paper, 1975-04; abstract online, updated
2009-06-01 in item #7 below) 46 p.
4) "Geopolitical Chaos: A Critical Survey of Historical Atlases
and World Affairs Mapping" (Canadian Political Science Association
Annual Meeting, London, Ontario, 1978-05) 36 p.
5) "'Mega-Map': Proposal for a 1/1,000,000 Outline Map of the
World in a Single Frame" [including this précis] (Canadian
Cartographic Association, Fourth Annual Meeting, York University, Toronto,
1979-05) 10 p. + 2 maps.
6) "Geocells and
the Megamap" (Presented at Canadian Learned Societies Annual Meeting:
Planetary Association for Clean Energy, 1983-06-02; updated 2007-03-31)
6 p.
7) "Notes on Scaling
Cahill and Cahill-Keyes Maps" (1982-06-23; updated 2009-03-07)
ca. 5 p. online, 2 illus.
7) "Evolution
of the Dymaxion Map: An Illustrated Tour and Critique" (2009-06-15)
17 web-pages, profusely illustrated
|